Q1 Landscape · Q2 Momentum

Where the activity is, and which way it is moving

Rising share Declining share Flat (within noise)

Show data table

Q2 Momentum over time

The three clusters that moved, month by month

Each line is the cluster's share of all in-scope arXiv preprints that month; all three panels use the same scale. Thin gray lines mark each 12-month window's average share. The share ratio R is trailing average ÷ preceding average. The first and last months are partial (2024-09-24 onward; up to 2026-09-22).

Show data table

Q3 Materials

Which materials are gaining or losing attention

95% CI above 1 95% CI below 1 CI includes 1

Show data table

Leading material families in each cluster (trailing 12 months)

Q4 Methods

Dominant experimental and computational techniques

Share grew (95% CI above 1) Flat

Trailing-12-month in-scope arXiv preprints tagged with each technique (refined keyword lexicon; a paper can carry several tags). Both panels share one scale.

Show data table

Q5 Beyond arXiv

What the other preprint servers add

Records are phrase-filtered quantum-materials hits in the trailing / preceding window. On-topic and fringe rates come from a hand audit of up to 25 records per server (about ±15–20 points). "Unique" means not found on arXiv; these are upper bounds, because arXiv matching covered only the four harvested cond-mat categories.

Q6 Noise

High-visibility claims that are contested or unreplicated

Noise filter applied

    How to read the table

    Supportive and critical counts are in-window preprints found in the corpus, with distinct research groups in brackets. Stances are labelled from titles and abstracts, not full texts, so the counts are floors. Claims are sorted by noise score.

    Scope, method and caveats

    How these numbers were made

    Scope

    Momentum label rule

    Caveats

      Citation check

      Every preprint ID cited in findings.md was checked against the harvested corpus by verify_citations.py: